三维塑形材料用于颅骨缺损修复的有效性和安全性的长期随访分析
作者:
作者单位:

华中科技大学同济医学院附属同济医院神经外科 430030 湖北武汉

基金项目:

湖北省病理生理学会面上项目(2021HBAP007),华中科技大学同济医学院附属同济医院横向课题(2022125)


Long-term follow-up analysis of the efficacy and safety of three - dimensional shaping materials for the repair of cranial defects
Affiliation:

Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology

  • 摘要
  • | |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • | |
  • 引证文献
  • |
    摘要:

    目的 探究三维塑形材料在颅骨缺损修复中的有效性及安全性。方法 回顾性分析我院使用三维塑形材料进行颅骨修复术的100例患者的临床资料。修复材料相关并发症定义为植入物断裂或外露。按是否发生修复材料相关并发症,分为无并发症组和并发症组。脑外伤患者预后评价采用格拉斯哥预后评分(Glasgow outcome sclae,GOS),脑出血患者预后评价采用改良Rankin评分(modified Rankin scale, mRS)。所有患者手术时间均超过五年,入组后进行电话随访,收集患者对颅骨修复后外形和功能恢复的满意度。结果 100例患者中,12例发现并发症,占12.0%,主要发生在颅骨修复术后1年内(占75.0%)。单因素分析发现糖尿病,颅骨切除术病因,修复材料种类和术中剥离颞肌与并发症的发生有关(p<0.05)。颅骨修复术显著改善患者近期和远期预后(均p<0.01)。65.0%患者对修复材料外形满意,31.0%患者基本满意,4%患者不满意。48.0%患者对颅骨修复手术后功能恢复非常满意,43.0%基本满意,9.0%不满意。结论 长期随访研究发现,三维塑形材料用于颅骨缺损修复手术有效性好,安全性高,但是修复材料相关并发症仍需引起术者重视。

    Abstract:

    Objective To investigate the effectiveness and safety of cranioplasty by using three-dimensional molding materials.Methods The clinical data of 100 patients who underwent cranioplasty by using three-dimensional molding materials in our hospital were retrospectively analyzed.Material-related complications were defined as implant fracture or exposure.The patients were categorized into none-complication group and complication group according to the occurrence of material-related complication. The prognosis of patients with traumatic brain injury was evaluated using the Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOS), and the prognosis of patients with cerebral hemorrhage was evaluated using the Modified Rankin Scale (mRS). The operation time of all patients exceeded five years. After enrollment, telephone follow - up was conducted to collect patients' satisfaction with the restoration of cranial shape and functional recovery after cranioplasty.Results Among 100 patients, material-related complications were found in 12 cases(12.0%), mainly occurring within 1 year after cranioplasty (75.0%). Univariate analysis found that diabetes mellitus, craniectomy for brain injury or cerebral hemorrhage, material for cranioplasty and intraoperative treatment of temporal muscle were associated with the development of complications (all p< 0.05). Craniectomy significantly improved the short- and long-term prognosis (both p < 0.01). Sixty-five percentage of the patients were satisfied with the profile of the cranial, 31.0% of the patients were mostly satisfied and 4% of the patients were dissatisfied. In addition, 48.0% of the patients were very satisfied with neurological recovery after craniectomy, 43.0% were mostly satisfied and 9.0% were dissatisfied. Conclusion According to the long-term follow-up, we found that three-dimensional molding material displays a more effective and safe result for cranioplasty. The material-related complications should be paid more attention during cranioplasty by the neurosurgeon.

    网友评论
    网友评论
    分享到微博
    发 布
    参考文献
    [1] Brown D.A., Wijdicks E.F.M. Decompressive craniectomy in acute brain injury. Handb. Clin. Neurol. 2017;140:299–318.S
    [2] Weadock WJ, Heisel CJ, Kahana A, Kim J. Use of 3D Printed Models to Create Molds for Shaping Implants for Surgical Repair of Orbital Fractures. Acad Radiol. 2020 Apr;27(4):536-542.
    [3] Giese H, Antritter J, Unterberg A, Beynon C. Long-Term Results of Neurological Outcome, Quality of Life, and Cosmetic Outcome After Cranioplastic Surgery: A Single Center Study of 202 Patients. Front Neurol. 2021 Jul 20;12:702339.
    [4] Halani SH, Chu JK, Malcolm JG, Rindler RS, Allen JW, Grossberg JA, Pradilla G, Ahmad FU. Effects of Cranioplasty on Cerebral Blood Flow Following Decompressive Craniectomy: A Systematic Review of the Literature. Neurosurgery. 2017 Aug 1;81(2):204-216.
    [5] Rynkowski CB, Robba C, Loreto M, Theisen ACW, Kolias AG, Finger G, Czosnyka M, Bianchin MM. Effects of Cranioplasty After Decompressive Craniectomy on Neurological Function and Cerebral Hemodynamics in Traumatic Versus Nontraumatic Brain Injury. Acta Neurochir Suppl. 2021;131:79-82.
    [6] Panwar N, Agrawal M, Sinha VD. Postcranioplasty Quantitative Assessment of Intracranial Fluid Dynamics and Its Impact on Neurocognition Cranioplasty Effect: A Pilot Study. World Neurosurg. 2019 Feb;122:e96-e107.
    [7] Piazza M, Grady MS. Cranioplasty. Neurosurg Clin N Am. 2017 Apr;28(2):257-265.S
    [8] Tack P, Victor J, Gemmel P, Annemans L. 3D-printing techniques in a medical setting: a systematic literature review. Biomed Eng Online. 2016 Oct 21;15(1):115.
    [9] Barros A, Brauge D, Quéhan R, Cavallier Z, Roux FE, Moyse E. One-Step Customized PEEK Cranioplasty After 3D Printed Resection Template Assisted Surgery for a Frontal Intraosseous Meningioma: A Case Report. Turk Neurosurg. 2021;31(1):142-147.
    [10] Moreira-Gonzalez A, Jackson IT, Miyawaki T, Barakat K, DiNick V. Clinical outcome in cranioplasty: critical review in long-term follow-up. J Craniofac Surg. 2003 Mar;14(2):144-53.S
    [11] Thien A, King NK, Ang BT, Wang E, Ng I. Comparison of polyetheretherketone and titanium cranioplasty after decompressive craniectomy. World Neurosurg. 2015 Feb;83(2):176-80.
    [12] Jiang Y, Wang YK, Yu MK. Spontaneous fracture of cranioplastic titanium implants without head trauma in an adult: A case report. Int J Surg Case Rep. 2016;24:50-3.S
    [13] Zhang R, Gao Z, Zhu YJ, Wang XF, Wang G, He JP. Spontaneous fracture of a titanium mesh cranioplasty implant in a child: A case report. World J Clin Cases. 2023 Mar 6;11(7):1593-1599.S
    [14] Yang J, Sun T, Yuan Y, Li X, Yu H, Guan J. Evaluation of titanium mesh cranioplasty and polyetheretherketone cranioplasty: protocol for a multicentre, assessor-blinded, randomised controlled trial. BMJ Open. 2019 Dec 3;9(12):e033997.
    [15] Scolozzi P, Martinez A, Jaques B. Complex orbito-fronto-temporal reconstruction using computer-designed PEEK implant. J Craniofac Surg. 2007 Jan;18(1):224-8.
    [16] Lethaus B, Safi Y, ter Laak-Poort M, Kloss-Brandst?tter A, Banki F, Robbenmenke C, Steinseifer U, Kessler P. Cranioplasty with customized titanium and PEEK implants in a mechanical stress model. J Neurotrauma. 2012 Apr 10;29(6):1077-83.
    [17] Maqbool T, Binhammer A, Binhammer P, Antonyshyn OM. Risk Factors for Titanium Mesh Implant Exposure Following Cranioplasty. J Craniofac Surg. 2018 Jul;29(5):1181-1186.S
    [18] Zhang P, Fu X, Huang Y; Wound Repair Professional Committee of Chinese Medical Doctor Association. Consensus on the prevention and repair of titanium mesh exposed wound after cranioplasty (2024 edition). Burns Trauma. 2024 Oct 23;12:tkae055.S
    [19] Han Y, Chen Y, Han Y, Chen Z, Li L, Pu W, Cui L, Chai M, Li Y. The use of free myocutaneous flap and implant reinsertion for staged cranial reconstruction in patients with titanium mesh exposure and large skull defects with soft tissue infection after cranioplasty: Report of 19 cases. Microsurgery. 2021 Oct;41(7):637-644.S
    [20] Sahoo NK, Tomar K, Thakral A, Kumar S. Failures in cranioplasty - A clinical audit review. J Oral Biol Craniofac Res. 2021 Jan-Mar;11(1):66-70.S
    [21] Williams LR, Fan KF, Bentley RP. Custom-made titanium cranioplasty: early and late complications of 151 cranioplasties and review of the literature. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2015 May;44(5):599-608.S
    [22] Satapathy D, Nadeem M, Shukla DP, Prabhuraj AR, Devi BI. Cosmetic Outcome of Cranioplasty After Decompressive Craniectomy-An Overlooked Aspect. World Neurosurg. 2019 Sep;129:e81-e86.
    [23] Klieverik VM, Robe PA, Muradin MSM, Woerdeman PA. Cosmetic satisfaction and patient-reported outcome measures following cranioplasty after craniectomy - A prospective cohort study. Brain Spine. 2023 Jun 18;3:101767.
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:4
  • 下载次数: 0
历史
  • 收稿日期:2024-12-20
  • 最后修改日期:2025-03-16
  • 录用日期:2025-03-17
温馨提示

本刊唯一投稿网址:www.xyosbs.com
唯一办公邮箱:xyent@126.com
编辑部联系电话:0731-84327210,84327469
本刊从未委托任何单位、个人及其他网站代理征稿及办理其他业务联系,谨防上当受骗!

关闭