单侧声带小息肉患者术后声休时间对嗓音功能的影响
作者:
基金项目:

山西省基础研究计划自然科学基金项目(20210302123250);山西医科大学博士启动基金资助项目(03201628);山西医科大学第一医院136专项经费科研项目(2021052923)。


Effect of postoperative voice rest duration on voice function in patients with unilateral small polyp of vocal cord
Author:
  • 摘要
  • | |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • | |
    摘要:

    目的 探讨单侧声带小息肉患者术后声休时间对嗓音功能的影响。方法 筛选山西医科大学第一医院耳鼻咽喉头颈外科住院部中拟行单侧声带小息肉手术的患者120例,术前予以嗓音卫生宣教,指导患者发声方法训练,并完善相关嗓音声学分析,包括基频微扰(Jitter)、振幅微扰(Shimmer)、最长发声时间(MPT)、嗓音障碍严重指数(DSI)、粗糙声/气息声/嘶哑声(RBH)、嗓音障碍指数量表(VHI)等,所有患者术前各嗓音声学参数差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。术后采用随机抽样法将患者分为3组,每组各40例。3组患者在常规治疗(健康教育、手术治疗、药物治疗)的基础上术后行绝对声休,其中A组术后声休3 d,B组术后声休7 d,C组术后声休2周;各组患者声休结束后予以8周的嗓音训练。术后3、6个月复查时对各组患者行嗓音声学分析,分析各组间嗓音声学参数的差异性,并与术前各嗓音声学参数进行对比。结果 ①术后3、6个月,各分组嗓音训练后Jitter、Shimmer、VHI、RBH均明显下降,MPT、DSI明显上升,与术前相比差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05);②术后3个月,A组和B组的Jitter、Shimmer、MPT、RBH、DSI、VHI值差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05),A组和C组的RBH、MPT、DSI、VHI值差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05),B组和C组的DSI、VHI值差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05),其余各项指标差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05);③术后6个月,A组和B组的Jitter、Shimmer、MPT、RBH、DSI、VHI值差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05),A组和C组的Shimmer、RBH、MPT、DSI、VHI值差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05),B组和C组的DSI、VHI值差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05),其余各项指标差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论 ①单侧声带小息肉患者在常规治疗的基础上,声休结合嗓音训练均可改善患者的嗓音质量;②单侧声带小息肉患者术后声休3 d,这样更有利于声带创面的愈合和发声功能的恢复。

    Abstract:

    Objective To explore the effect of postoperative voice rest duration on voice function in patients with unilateral small polyp of vocal cord.Methods A total of 120 patients undergoing surgical treatment of unilateral small polyp of vocal cord in our department were included. Before operation, all the patients were given voice hygiene education and guidance of vocalization training, as well as acoustic analysis including fundamental frequency perturbation (Jitter), fundamental frequency perturbation (Shimmer), maximum phonation time (MPT), dysphonia severity index (DSI), roughness, breathiness and hoarseness (RBH), voice handicap index (VHI), etc. They were randomly divided into 3 groups with 40 cases in each according to the postoperative voice rest duration on the basis of routine treatment (health education, surgical treatment, and medical treatment). The postoperative voice rest durations were 3 days, 7 days and 2 weeks in group A, B and group C respectively. All patients had voice training for 8 weeks after voice rest. At 3 and 6 months after operation, acoustic analysis was performed respectively. The post-treatment voice acoustic parameters were compared with the preoperative ones and among different groups, and their differences were analyzed.Results ①At 3 months and 6 months after surgery, the Jitter, Shimmer, VHI and RBH all decreased significantly compared with the preoperative ones in all groups, while the MPT, DSI increased significantly. The differences were statistically significant (P<0.05). ②At 3 months after surgery, the differences of Jitter, Shimmer, MPT, RBH, DSI, and VHI values between groups A and B, those of RBH, MPT, DSI, and VHI values between groups A and C, and those of DSI and VHI values between groups B and C were all statistically significant (all P<0.05). ③ In 6 months after surgery, the differences of Jitter, Shimmer, MPT, RBH, DSI, and VHI values between groups A and B, those of Shimmer, RBH, MPT, DSI, and VHI values between groups A and C, and those of DSI and VHI values between groups B and C were all statistically significant (all P<0.05).Conclusions On the basis of routine treatment, voice rest combined with voice training can improve the voice quality of patients. Postoperative voice rest with duration of 3 days is more conducive to the healing of vocal cord wound and the recovery of vocal function for patients with unilateral voice polyp.

    网友评论
    网友评论
    分享到微博
    发 布
    参考文献
    [1] 黄永旺.实用临床嗓音医学[M].天津:天津科技翻译出版公司,2012:177-309.
    [2] Behrman A, Sulica L. Voice rest after microlaryngoscopy:current opinion and practice[J]. Laryngoscope,2003,113(12):2182-2186.
    [3] 张承宏. 支撑喉镜联合鼻内镜下内侧微瓣法治疗广基声带息肉疗效分析[J]. 听力学及言语疾病杂志,2013,21(2):23-24.
    [4] 卢文,胡廷保. 声带息肉患者术后含水发声训练效果观察[J].护理学杂志,2011,26(18):46-48.
    [5] 徐峰,许晓英. 不同术式治疗广基型声带息肉的临床疗效及术后嗓音功能的对比分析[J]. 中国医学创新,2013,10(22):12-13.
    [6] 周洁,陈永国,付剑锋,等. 二氧化碳激光与常规冷器械切除声带良性病变的疗效比较[J].中国耳鼻咽喉颅底外科杂志,2022,28(3):91-94.
    [7] 郑智英,王斌全. 电子喉镜下声带息肉手术前后的嗓音声学评估[J]. 医学研究杂志,2012,41(9):171-173.
    [8] Björck G, Hertegård S, Ekelund J, et al. Voice rest after vocal fold polyp surgery:A Swedish register study of 588 patients[J]. Laryngoscope Investig Otolaryngol,2022,7(2):486-493.
    [9] 张苹.声带息肉患者在支撑喉镜下显微手术后嗓音康复训练的研究进展[J].当代护士(上旬刊),2021,28(2):16-18.
    [10] Kaneko M, Shiromoto O, Fujiu-Kurachi M, et al. Optimal duration for voice rest after vocal fold surgery:randomized controlled clinical study[J]. J Voice,2017,31(1):97-103.
    [11] 石璐璐,张汝锋,肖虎.白细胞介素6/信号转导及转录激活因子3通路及β连环蛋白在机械应力致小鼠增生性瘢痕形成中的作用[J]中华烧伤杂志2021,37(7):647-653.
    [12] 郭文俊,王斌全,曹常乐,等.动态喉镜声带息肉术后嗓音康复训练时间研究[J].护理学杂志,2017,32(12):85-87,90.
    [13] Rousseau B, Cohen SM, Zeller AS, et al. Compliance and quality of life in patients on prescribed voice rest[J]. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg,2011,144(1):104-107.
    引证文献
引用本文

刘晨阳,李育军,常淼,韩悦,张森,皇甫辉.单侧声带小息肉患者术后声休时间对嗓音功能的影响[J].中国耳鼻咽喉颅底外科杂志,2023,29(6):60-64

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:73
  • 下载次数: 213
历史
  • 收稿日期:2022-10-08
  • 在线发布日期: 2024-01-04
温馨提示

本刊唯一投稿网址:www.xyosbs.com
唯一办公邮箱:xyent@126.com
编辑部联系电话:0731-84327210,84327469
本刊从未委托任何单位、个人及其他网站代理征稿及办理其他业务联系,谨防上当受骗!

关闭