小儿先天性耳廓形态畸形无创矫正疗效分析
作者:
基金项目:

北航-首医大数据精准医疗高精尖创新中心同仁分中心开放基金(BHTR-KFJJ-202002)。


Analysis of nonsurgical treatment of congenital auricle deformities in infants
Author:
  • 摘要
  • | |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • | |
    摘要:

    目的 分析应用耳模矫治器无创矫正小儿先天性耳廓形态畸形的疗效,为提高矫正效果提供指导。方法 选取2021年1—6月收治的65例(95耳)先天性耳廓形态畸形患儿为研究对象,根据年龄分为3组,≤7 d为A组(31耳),8~42 d为B组(50耳),>42 d为C组(14耳),使用EarWell耳模矫治器治疗,记录3组患儿矫正时间、矫正效果及其并发症。结果 3组矫正时间之间比较,差异均具有统计学意义(P<0.05),且A组时间明显短于B、C组两组;显效及治愈率3组比较均具有统计学意义(P<0.05),且A组优于B组,B组优于C组;3组并发症发病率各组间无统计学意义(P>0.05),并发症主要为湿疹,经涂布抗湿疹药后均于2 d内消退。结论 耳模矫治器无创矫正小儿先天性耳廓形态畸形疗效显著,年龄越小,显效及治愈率越高,矫治时间越短。

    Abstract:

    Objective To analyze the nonsurgical treatment effect of ear molding device for congenital auricle deformities in infants, and to provide guidance for improvement of efficacy.Methods A total of 65 infants (95 ears) with congenital auricle deformities admitted from Jan to June 2021 were selected as the research subjects. They were divided into 3 groups according to the initial age of correction:group A (≤ 7 days) (n=31), group B (8-42 days) (n=50), and group (C >42 days) (n=14). The correction time, correction effect and complications of 3 groups were recorded and compared.Results The correction time of group A was significantly shorter than those of group B and group C (P<0.05). The differences of effect and cure rate among the three groups were statistically significant (P<0.05), group A was better than group B, and group B was better than group C. The differences of incidence of complications among the three groups were statistically insignificant (P>0.05). The main complication was eczema, which resolved within 2 days after application of anti-eczema drugs.Conclusions The nonsurgical treatment by ear molding device is effective for congenital auricular deformities. The earlier the child receives the treatment, the better the effect and the shorter the correction time are.

    网友评论
    网友评论
    分享到微博
    发 布
    参考文献
    [1] Byrd HS, Langevin CJ, Ghidoni LA. Ear molding in newborn infants with auricular deformities[J]. Plast Reconstr Surg, 2010, 126(4):1191-1200.
    [2] 傅窈窈,谢友舟,郭英,等.先天性耳郭形态异常的分类及治疗现状[J].中国眼耳鼻喉科杂志,2018,18(5):310-313.
    [3] 中华医学会耳鼻咽喉头颈外科学分会小儿学组.先天性耳廓畸形耳模矫正技术专家共识[J].中华耳鼻咽喉头颈外科杂志,2019,54(5):330-333.
    [4] 吴胜林,齐向东,赵卉,等.新生儿耳廓形态学分型的初步研究[J].中国临床解剖学杂志,2013,31(4):384-388.
    [5] Brent B. Microtia repair with rib cartilage grafts:a review of personal experience with 1000 cases[J].Clin Plast Surg,2002,29(2):257-271.
    [6] Horlock N, V gelin E, Bradbury ET, et al. Psychosocial outcome of patients after ear reconstruction:a retrospective study of 62 patients[J]. Ann Plast Surg, 2005,54(5):517-524.
    [7] Matsuo K, Hirose T, Tomono T, et al. Nonsurgical correction of congenital auricular deformities in the early neonate:a preliminary report[J]. Plast Reconstr Surg,1984,73(1):38-51.
    [8] Kurozumi N, Ono S, Ishida H. Non-surgical correction of a congenital lop ear deformity by splinting with Reston foam[J]. Br J Plast Surg,1982,35(2):181-182.
    [9] Doft MA, Goodkindab, Diamonds, et al. The new born butterfly project:a short end treatment protocol for ear molding[J]. Plast Reconstr Surg,2015,135(3):577-583.
    [10] 周智英,付勇,毕静,等.耳矫正模型对小儿先天性耳廓畸形的近期应用研究[J].临床耳鼻咽喉头颈外科学杂志,2017,31(12):949-952.
    [11] Tan ST, Abramson DL, MacDonald DM, et al. Molding therapy for infants with deformational auricular anomalies[J]. Ann Plast Surg,1997,38(3):263-268.
    [12] 王素芳,邓哲,韩富根,等.2~6月龄婴幼儿先天性耳形态畸形无创矫正的效果观察[J].中华耳科学杂志,2019,17(4):527-531.
    [13] 陈沛维,李洁,赵守琴,等.新型耳矫治器对小儿先天性耳廓畸形治疗效果分析[J].临床耳鼻咽喉头颈外科杂志,2017,31(11):849-853.
    [14] 尚海琼,于晓宇,李依琳,等.耳廓无创矫正器治疗先天性耳廓畸形效果分析[J].浙江医学,2021,43(9):990-992.
    引证文献
引用本文

马晓波,陈沛维,李颖,刘宇洁,杨琳,赵守琴.小儿先天性耳廓形态畸形无创矫正疗效分析[J].中国耳鼻咽喉颅底外科杂志,2022,28(3):21-25

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:680
  • 下载次数: 292
历史
  • 收稿日期:2022-06-10
  • 在线发布日期: 2022-07-04
温馨提示

本刊唯一投稿网址:www.xyosbs.com
唯一办公邮箱:xyent@126.com
编辑部联系电话:0731-84327210,84327469
本刊从未委托任何单位、个人及其他网站代理征稿及办理其他业务联系,谨防上当受骗!

关闭