骨导振动刺激诱发的前庭诱发肌源性电位
作者:
基金项目:

国家自然基金资助项目(81670945);陕西省国际科技合作重点项目(2017KW048);西安交通大学医学院第二附属医院人才培养专项基金[RC(GG)201407];西安交通大学第二附属医院新技术新疗法项目(XJEFY2017041)。


Vestibularevoked myogenic potential induced by boneconducted vibration
  • 摘要
  • | |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
    摘要:

    目的探讨B81骨振子在前庭诱发肌源性电位(vestibularevoked myogenic potentials, VEMPs)检测中的应用。方法对25例正常志愿者的双耳行插入式气导声刺激(airconducted sound, ACS),单侧乳突B81骨导振动刺激(boneconducted vibration, BCV)的VEMPs检查,并对ACS,BCVVEMPs检查结果进行统计学分析。结果ACS,BCV眼肌前庭诱发肌源性电位(ocular vestibularevoked myogenic potentials, oVEMP)的引出率分别为92%(46/50),98%(49/50)。BCVoVEMP与ACSoVEMP比较,两者引出率差异无统计学意义(P=0.36);两者N1波潜伏期(P=0.00)、P1波潜伏期(P=0.00)、N1P1波间期(P=0.01)及振幅(P=0.00)差异均具有统计学意义(P<0.05);BCVoVEMP的N1、P1波潜伏期,N1P1波间期均较短,而振幅较大。ACS,BCV颈肌前庭诱发肌源性电位(cervical vestibularevoked myogenic potential, cVEMP)的引出率均为100%(50/50)。BCVcVEMP与ACScVEMP比较,N1波潜伏期差异无统计学意义(P=0.96),P1波潜伏期(P=0.02),P1N1波间期(P=0.00)、振幅(P=0.04)均有统计学差异(P<0.05);BCVcVEMP的P1波潜伏期较短,P1N1波间期较长,振幅较大。BCVoVEMP、ACSoVEMP、BCVcVEMP和ACScVEMP的两耳间振幅不对称率(%)分别为:28.08±21.10、27.95±18.13、23.60±17.86、32.24±18.92。结论B81骨振子可以用于VEMPs的检测,骨导振动刺激在评价传导性听力损失患者的前庭耳石器功能时优于气导声刺激,可作为气导声刺激诱发VEMPs的补充检查。

    Abstract:

    ObjectiveTo investigate the application of B81 bone vibrator in the detection of vestibularevoked myogenic potentials (VEMPs). MethodsBilateral airconducted sound (ACS), unilateral B81 boneconducted vibration (BCV) VEMPs were detected in 25 normal volunteers. Their results were analyzed statistically.ResultsThe response rates of ACS, BCVocular VEMP (oVEMP) were 92% (46/50) and 98% (49/50) respectively, and the difference was statistically insignificant (P>0.05). N1 wave latency, P1 wave latency and N1P1 wave interval of BCVoVEMP were shorter than those of ACSoVEMP while the N1P1 amplitude of BCVoVEMP was greater than that of ACSoVEMP, and the differences were all statistically different (all P<0.05). The response rates of ACS, BCVcervical VEMP(cVEMP) were both 100% (50/50). Compared with ACScVEMP, BCVcVEMP had no statistical difference in N1 wave latency (P>0.05), while the P1 wave latency, P1N1 wave interval and amplitude were statistically different (P<0.05). The P1 wave latency of BCVcVEMP was shorter, and the P1N1 wave interval was longer and the amplitude was larger than those of ACScVEMP respectively, and the differences were all statistically significant (all P<0.05). The amplitude asymmetry rates between the two ears of BCVoVEMP, ACSoVEMP, BCVcVEMP and ACScVEMP were (28.08±21.10)%, (27.95±18.13) %, (23.60±17.86) %, and (32.24±18.92)%, respectively.ConclusionsB81 bone vibrator can be used for the detection of VEMPs. Boneconduced vibration is superior to airconducted sound in evaluating vestibular otolith function in patients with conductive hearing loss. It can be used as a supplementary examination of VEMPs.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

张玉忠,魏馨雨,陈耔辰,孙曼,张超,成颖,高滢,陈飞云,胡娟,许珉,张青.骨导振动刺激诱发的前庭诱发肌源性电位[J].中国耳鼻咽喉颅底外科杂志,2018,24(6):513-517

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
历史
  • 在线发布日期: 2018-12-31
温馨提示

本刊唯一投稿网址:www.xyosbs.com
唯一办公邮箱:xyent@126.com
编辑部联系电话:0731-84327210,84327469
本刊从未委托任何单位、个人及其他网站代理征稿及办理其他业务联系,谨防上当受骗!

关闭